“The small level of opposition to Roberts’ nomination indicates the public has yet to hear anything they consider controversial about the nominee,” comments Opinion Dynamics Corporation Vice President Lawrence Shiman."
He is charming, good looking, has a solid record as a lawyer, cute kids, and a very nice looking wife. He has never said or done anything that would give the Democrats any fuel for the filibuster fire they are so keen on.
I am not entirely sure that is a good thing.
Where EXACTLY does he stand? How can we know if he will not offer any opinion, make any statement, that might anger the Libs. (I love angry Libs. When Libs don't like it, it must be good
I trust Bush. He is a good leader, and while I am not keen on his expansion of the Federal machine, I do not think he would pick an unqualified candidate, or a candidate that he does not think would be all that Bush has promised us. But, will Robert's turn out like his father's pick? (Let's face it, David H. Souter was a BAD choice.) Or, will we have another Sandra Day O'Connor?? (Not one of Reagan's best choices, God rest his soul)
The mind reels.
Mr. Roberts, if you could, please give me some hope, one bone to gnaw on, a SCRAP of hope. Give me some indication that you will uphold the Constitution, you will not legislate from the bench, or use the bench as your own personal bully pulpit. That you will follow the path of Scalia and Thomas. Be what this nation needs.
Be a conservative!
P.S. As for the issue of his refusing to answer questions, this is a prescient set by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If the Libs start losing their minds over this, I really wish that some brave and out-spoken Conservative would remind them of this. They started it, like it or lump it! (Neener-neener-neener















